This article is available for
download in PDF format here
A file with all the articles is
available for download here
[The Articles of
Indignation: Article 10]
HOW KIP MCKEAN’S
OLD MOVEMENT FELL AND WHAT THIS SAYS ABOUT THE FATE OF THE ICC
By Daniel Berg
This
article was retracted earlier (it was the former article 9 but then I switched
the order when this article was temporarily retracted) because some believed
that I had neglectfully portrayed controversial concepts in an absolute manner
when it should have been made clear that this is theory (actually I did mention
in the original document that this was a theory but I guess I needed to make it
more clear to some of these ICC “critics”). A theory is of course a hypothesis
based on a careful and rational explanation of facts; you will find such
rationality lacking in the propaganda that Kip McKean attempts to pass off on
his congregation about these past events as I’m about to show. Another reason
for retracting it was that some people told me that they needed “more
convincing” that the corruption written about in the Apology Letters was
related to Kip’s regime since they actually came out a short time after he was
forced to step down as Lead Evangelist so now I present additional evidence. It may seem that my effort of pushing back
this article’s release to include additional evidence may have been for naught
at the moment since the ICC has been intimidating their members into not
looking at this material as I predicted they would do in my 8th
article, but eventually some may come to their senses and actually start to do
some research for themselves rather than believing whatever these ICC leaders
tell them.
Many
articles can be found that discuss reasons for why Kip McKean’s “Old Movement”
fell. The “Old Movement” is of course the ICC’s name for the ICOC during the
time that Kip was in leadership. The ICC’s version of the events that happened
in the ICOC leading up to 2003 is significantly different from that told by
those who left during this time as well as the side of the story told by some
of the ICOC leaders.
The
ICC leaders who previously came from the ICOC claim that the failure of their
first movement was due to the “ungodliness” and "bitterness" of their previous
congregation. On the other side, many previous ICOC members claim that the
leadership was abusive and arrogant and in 2003 the ICOC leaders even wrote
letters of apology asking for forgiveness for their past practices of coercing
money out of the congregation. I will compare these witness accounts side by
side with the ICC’s claims of what happened in order to come up with a viable
theory for why the Old Movement failed.
Whenever
I would ask someone in the ICC what happened to Kip’s Old Movement, they would
tell either that they didn’t know or would obscurely refer to the events that
led to Kip McKean being taken out of leadership as “the great confusion”. Other
people I asked to give me reasons for why Kip had to resign would put the blame
solely on the congregation saying that they were all “bitter”. This is not a
godly accusation because according to James 3:1 aren’t the teachers and leaders
supposed to be held in higher accountability? Why was the blame almost entirely
being shoved on the congregation? Why were these people “bitter”? It seemed
unbelievable to me that even after asking around for six years in the ICC, no
one seemed capable of giving me a coherent answer to these events and any
explanations that they did attempt to give were either nonsensical or obviously
biased.
Back
when the Henry Kriete letter came out many ICOC leaders apologized for the
abusive behavior that was unveiled, while others wanted to put the blame on
Kriete as if he were the one responsible for the damage caused. It was truly a
chaotic time for the ICOC and Kip McKean tries to take advantage of this chaos
by spinning his own interpretation to the events that followed in his letter “From Babylon Onto Zion”.
When
the content of the Henry Kriete letter and the Apology Letters is brought to
light many of those in the ICC argue that this system of corruption had been
the result of Steve Johnson’s leadership since these letters came out in March 2003
but this was only 4 months after Kip had resigned in November 2002.
Such
an effective system of abusive control and manipulative coercion could not have
been created in such a short amount of time, it had to have been put into
effect since Kip McKean’s time of leadership. My assertion that the ICOC’s
abusive system of control existed long before Kip resigned is not without
evidence. Henry Kriete’s second letter states:
“I want to set the record straight
because I take exception to being used as a scapegoat for the present chaos
which developed over the past 25 years, and I detest being used as a tool to
somehow bolster and justify the plans of these men with their bold visions of
the future. Henry ruined London! Henry caused all of this chaos and made most
of you bitter! How desperate is that? Even absurd?”
In
“Honest to God” Henry Kriete states that he had begun to write his first letter
18 months before it actually came out on February 2, 2003. Therefore this means
that he began writing about the corruption in the ICOC in early August 2001
which was almost 4 months before Kip McKean stepped down from leading the L.A.
church and a year and 4 months before Kip had to resign as World Mission’s
Evangelist and leader of the World Sector Leaders and he asserts that this
corruption had been in constant development for the past 25 years.
Many
of the ICOC Apology Letters reference Kriete’s letter directly as a basis for
their apologies such as the Dallas Ft Worth, Houston, Los Angeles, Minneapolis,
Orlando, S Florida and Toronto ICOC Apology Letters.
These
letters from 2003 mention Henry Kriete are in agreement with what he wrote
about the coercion in giving, the manipulation, and the abusive methods of
control. Many of the other letters are also in agreement with this although
they did not mention Kriete specifically. This gives credibility to the content
of Henry Kriete’s letter and to the fact that this corruption had spread
throughout the churches and existed before Kip stepped down. Add to this the
voices of 250,000 people who left the ICOC before this time telling accounts of
abuse that match the abuses of the ICC that are described in my previous
articles. The ICC’s excuse that Kip was not involved in this corruption because
these letters did not come out until 2003 is an invalid argument, especially
when Kip is now using these very tactics on his new congregation. It wasn’t
until Kip lost his grip of power on the leaders that some became bold enough to
write these letters which exposed their faults and abuses. Below I show how the
content of these letters parallel what is currently happening in the ICC.
The Apology Letters
Minneapolis Apology Letter ,
Orlando Apology Letter ,
Toronto Apology Letter ,
S Florida Apology Letter ,
New York Apology Letter ,
Manila Apology Letter ,
Los Angeles Apology Letter ,
Houston Apology Letter ,
Hong Kong Apology Letter ,
Denver Apology Letter ,
Dallas Ft. Worth Apology Letter ,
Boston Apology Letter ,
Guillermo Adame Apology Letter ,
St. Louis Apology Letter
After
much coercion, exploitation, and abusive control of the membership was revealed by Henry Kriete's Letter many ICOC leaders wrote letters of apology to their congregation for this abuse
of power; these all mirror what is currently happening in the ICC.
The Bible commands that each person
should decide what they want to give to God and then do it cheerfully and not
under compulsion. Often times in the past this passage has been sinfully
ignored and people have been compelled to give. This has caused many people
heartache and sorrow and caused some to leave the church. These practices are
being strongly condemned and will never be repeated. This kind of compulsion
has taken the form of excessive accountability during the special contribution. –Minneapolis
Apology Letter, March 12, 2003
Another
significant part of this letter is when they admitted to “following up” with
people for a special contribution even after a special contribution was already
over:
There have been times in the past where
the special contribution was given and then a second effort was made to try and
meet the goal. This should never have been done and amounted to forcing people
to give.
-Minneapolis
Apology Letter, March 12, 2003
This
“follow up” behavior matches what I wrote in my article, The ICC’s Corrupt Policies for Money Part 2:
I know of church members who were in
financial trouble yet still gave as much as they could for the special
contribution, though it was not the full amount that they asked for. Rather than being grateful for the gift that
these members had given sacrificially, instead the ICC leaders would sit down
with them in a private meeting then subject them to character assassination methods;
calling them “selfish” and that they should be “ashamed of their negligence” in
not being able to come up with the full contribution that they imposed on
them. Then once they have the
member/victim feeling bad about themselves they tell them to pay the rest of
their special contribution at a later time, as if it was some kind of debt that
they owe.
Once
again we see the exact same abusive tactics that were practiced during Kip’s
old regime being carried over to his new organization. These “special
contributions” are supposed to be equivalent to donations that are given willingly;
this kind of behavior is obscene and ungodly.
The
Minneapolis apology letter also confirms the manipulative nature of dictating
the amounts to be given for the special contributions:
Each year we were given a special
contribution goal by Seattle and were not involved in deciding for ourselves
what we should give. This won’t ever be repeated. All of the above practices
were manipulative and controlling. They caused people to stumble and feel
compelled to give. We are very sorry that they ever happened and hope you will
forgive us for our involvement in them. –Minneapolis Apology Letter, March 12,
2003
We
see that the exact same deceitful tactics for wrestling money out of members
rather than righteous voluntary giving. Some of the apology letters even admit
that these tactics amounted to coercion, such as the Houston apology letter:
At a meeting on Sunday, February 22,
2003, many sins and areas of concern were identified and discussed. Among the
key areas that we believe need to be explored and changed are:
• Issues of financial giving such as coercion in giving, improper mandate of
the
Special Contribution, and feelings of
failure caused by humanistic goals and expectations.
• Abusive leadership and discipleship practices such
as impure motivation caused by an undue emphasis on image and statistics, giving “permission” instead of advice,
and a lack of approachability and humility on the part of some members of our
leadership and staff
–Houston ICOC Apology Letter, March 2003
If
you read the Seeking Advice for a Means
of Control section of my article; The
ICC’s Psychological Control System, I described how a system of “seeking
advice” was being used to control people. Was this system used in the ICOC as
well? Yes it was, as is proven in the apology letters written by the Orland and
Guillermo Adame ICOC leadership:
We have fostered a culture of control
through harsh “one over another” relationships. Though we deeply believe in the
plan of Jesus for maturing the body, we have allowed that plan to degenerate
into relationships that are intolerant, judgmental, harsh, and abusive. Advice
has been viewed as law, leading to untold interference in many personal areas
of your lives, from dating to finances to living situations and much, much
more.
–Orlando Apology Letter
People were made to feel sinful and
horrible if they didn't take advice. For example, many were pressured not to
move from San Diego even though there were good reasons to move. Others were
driven out of the church if they didn't agree with how things were done or with
the structure of leadership. That's over. I'm truly sorry. I ask that you visit
us again and give the church and myself a chance to prove our repentance to
you.
–Guillermo Adame ICOC Apology Letter, April 14, 2003
We have assumed, wrongly, that the sheep
are stupid. We have trained them to depend on men, on us in fact, and not on
Christ. ‘Did you get advice’ for the most part means ‘Did you get permission.’
Yes of course, they are vulnerable and open to attack, but they are not stupid. –Henry Kriete
We
also see the ICOC Apology Letters commenting on the shallow and repetitive
preaching that caused people to feel “starved spiritually:
We have failed to teach the Scriptures
responsibly. Over the years, we have conducted our midweek services as pep
rallies, and our Sunday services have at times been shallow and non-worshipful.
Though we are very excited about 2003 being “the year of digging deeper,” and
about the renewed emphasis on worshipping God in our Lord’s day meetings, these
changes came about far too late, and we know that many of you have been starved
spiritually.
–Orlando ICOC Apology Letter
I
have noticed this same trend in the ICC, however, when this issue is brought up
the response of the ICC leadership is that the reason these people are not
learning from their lessons is because they are not “spiritual enough”, and
therefore everyone refers to every lesson as “awesome” no matter how dull or
propagandistic because they desire to be seen as “spiritual” in the eyes of the
upper leadership. This is a flat-out refusal to see history repeating itself
and is the damage caused by the leadership’s intentional use of psychological
influence through repetition which I described in my articles concerning
psychological concepts around the leadership’s decisions.
During
my time with the ICC I would bring up the apparent abuse of leadership and
always receive the same answer “the leadership is not perfect, we all make
mistakes”. So they mean to tell me that the same “mistakes” have been
replicated twice? Sure Steve Johnson did apologize for some of this some time after
he took over for Kip as Lead Evangelist but this abuse was due to the system
that Kip had left in place and Steve had failed to completely eradicate it. These
aren’t “mistakes”, this came about by design and there was absolutely no effort
made to change these “mistakes” as the behavior of the leadership began to get
progressively worse. It is no coincidence that these “mistakes” are all
centered around money, control and psychological manipulation.
The
same kind of abusive tactics that were described in these letters are the same
tactics being currently used in the ICC. Kip McKean tries to blame the other
leaders for this and the fact that these letters did not come out until 2003
enabled Kip to hide from this blame somewhat, but it is now apparent who really
invented this abusive system since Kip has resurrected it once again in the
ICC.
Kip McKean’s Propaganda against Henry
Kriete and others in “From Babylon Onto
Zion”
In
Kip McKean’s letter From Babylon onto
Zion he tries to spin his own interpretation on the past events that
transpired that led up to the Henry Kriete letter:
Autonomy is not a Biblical doctrine, nor
is the word found in all Scripture. It is a spirit of unbridled independence.
In some cases autonomy has fostered a spirit of nationalism separating the
fathers of faith who had built these churches from their spiritual children. It
should be noted that we falsely “gloried” in our movement’s unity. Disunity was
sown for years into the hearts of many leaders and followers. This was
evidenced in their feelings of suppression that led to the then silent sins of
criticalness, envy, bitterness and anger. It was in this atmosphere that Henry Kreite
wrote his letter, Honest to God. With the central leadership of the kingdom now
being nonexistent, there was no “church leadership” to answer. Since the letter
contained many elements of truth mixed with misinformation and bitterness,
there was an outcry in many parts of our fellowship for a need to change “the
system” and many of the ways we do things.
Kip
acted as if their feelings of suppression were only imagined, that it was
something that came about from “disunity” that was sown in their hearts. Notice
once again the tactical obscurity in his statement. What was this “disunity” he
spoke of? Where did it come from? Was it not the abusive policies that were
being enforced on the congregation for the sake of money? But once again we see
that Kip tries to steer clear of this subject.
Kip
further writes:
Since the letter contained many elements
of truth mixed with misinformation and bitterness, there was an outcry in many
parts of our fellowship for a need to change “the system” and many of the ways
we do things.
This
is a reference to Henry Kriete’s letter, once again we see obscure statements
that the information “was not accurate” (misinformation) as well as throwing in
that Kriete was “bitter” without any specific reference as to what was
misrepresented or what statements that Henry Kriete made that would designate
him as being “bitter”. Once again we see the usual obscure character
assassination in action which I talked about in my article; “Character Assassination: The Bitter Card
and The Prideful Card.” For Kip
this is business as usual. After reading Henry Kriete’s letter, I saw nothing
to indicate that his man was bitter at all, in fact, he seemed hopeful that the
churches would repent and that they would all move on to a brighter future. It
is interesting to note the hypocrisy of Kip complaining that people were
character assassinating him even though he was character assassinating others
in the very same letter.
It
gets worse as Kip then writes:
Henry advocated “a time for anger and
the overthrowing of temples. I believe that time is now.”
He urged churches to have “open forums”
which further poisoned the membership towards the leaders as a little yeast
works through the whole batch of dough. In my opinion, a license to sin was
handed to bitter disciples who, under the guise of “freedom in Christ,” often spoke
publicly with malice and slander towards the ministry leaders and those who led
them.
Before
we draw any conclusions, let’s see what Henry Kriete said in his letters:
A backlash from years of ‘not
listening’, insensitivity, abuse, coercion and legalism –as well as cowardice
from the full-time ministry leaders to stand up for the truth- is now under
way. We are in the midst of excruciating openness and pain right now. The
credibility of much of the ministry staff is now being questioned .We are
having open forums - and years of suffering, questions and concerns are pouring
out. Some of it is hostile; some of it, unspeakably sad; and to be sure, some
of it unfair. However, every last word is useful. –1st
HK Letter
I never intended to burn the house down.
I never invented open forums, and I certainly never advocated bitterness-but
these things did happen. Open forums were recommended by me, certainly, but
only peaceful and respectful open forums. This should be obvious to anyone who
bothers to sincerely read my letter to completion, and not falsely accuse me of
calling for violence and widespread bitterness. –2nd
HK Letter
It
seems that Kip is trying to blame the mess in the open forums on Kriete here;
that it was his fault by suggesting open forums that these members were
“poisoned”, however, it is clear that Kriete did not encourage the hostile
behavior on the part of those on the forums. Kip further character assassinates
his former congregation by calling them “bitter” while dismissing the accounts
of those who were abused calling it “slander”.
Kip
McKean then further adds:
Even sadder, few disciples stood up in
loving boldness to confront these ungodly outbursts.
Kip’s
statement suggests that to oppose and denounce these victims’ accounts was the
“godly” thing to do, but when you look at the beginning of Kriete’s account it
is obvious why he felt that it had to be done this way, these victims were
being completely ignored. The reason why so few people tried to go against
these accounts was because they knew full well the abuse that was going on and
knew that the leaders had been culprits in this along with years of ignoring
all these problems. Everyone knew that there had to be a change, and the
leadership was unwilling to make this change on their own without a strong
enough outcry.
Kip
again writes words to bring the “accuracy” of Henry Kriete’s letter into
question:
My emotional, but dear, son in the faith
Henry raised several issues that had varying degrees of validity. However, I
believe some were simply not accurate. Many
members went too far, and instead of having brotherly dialogue, they began to
bite and devour each other, destroying whole congregations in the name of
freedom. (Galatians 5:1–15) –Kip McKean
He
also once again brings up the things written in the forums (but only focusing
on the hostile comments rather than the valid accounts of the abused) and once
again tries to insinuate that Kriete was at fault. These people were abused due
to these abusive policies, and yet he shows no sign of wanting to admit this
and instead tries to suggest that the blame should be put on Kriete for giving
these people the chance to speak out who would have probably been completely
ignored otherwise. This ignorance of the victims of abuse is apparent in the
Orlando Apology letter:
We have dismissed as irrelevant the
valid observations of our critics. Many people have left the church because
they were hurt and devastated by many of the above-mentioned abuses. People
have been labeled “fall-aways” because they have not agreed with us on all
aspects of our terminology and practices. We request your help in contacting
many of these people so that we can humbly apologize and request their
forgiveness.
–Orlando Apology Letter
Now the rest of the staff, who have also
suffered from abuses of authority, are having to own up to their own misguided
pressures and practices over the years, the whole process falling like dominoes
all around the UK. Whether from commission, omission, cowardice, bad theology
or irresponsibility -our sins needed to be exposed and acknowledged for
repentance and healing to take place, and for the crucial restoration of trust. –Henry Kriete,
Honest to God
Henry
Kriete wanted repentance and healing, and yet Kip tries to make this man out to
be a sower of destruction and later in the letter he even gloats about negative
events that happen in Kriete’s home church, as if all of these things were
attributed to him. He opens this part of the letter with; “It should be noted, and I find this sad, that few asked, ‘What
happened to the church where Henry served?’” First of all why would we find
this sad? Second of all; if these people wanted to know what happened to London
why would they want to ask Kip rather than asking Henry Kriete or the London
church directly? The fact that very few people would come to Kip with such
questions should have come as no surprise to him given the alarming concerns
about his leadership. This is quite the cheesy lead-in to begin slandering
Kriete’s London church here for losing members as though it had been Kriete’s
fault for sending his letter (even though there have been many cases in his
“New Movement” where his churches have dwindled or completely disappeared from
the map, which he calls “pruning”; his bias is certainly evident); he was just
biting at the bit to spread whatever dirt he could find on those who assisted
in throwing a wrench in his plans.
Here is what Henry had to say about
the London church (you don’t see Kip asking him
what happened):
And may I permanently remind you and
everyone else, the London church had already unraveled and was going through a
leadership crisis before my letter was sent to a single person. Thanks for
taking note of this)
The true destruction, however, was the abuse
and coercion against the members who were being exploited. Either Kip refused
to see this or he just didn’t care, the latter is probably more likely since he
has once again instituted the exact same abusive policies into the ICC for his
own profit. Many of the ICOC apology letters showed that many leaders sided
with Kriete that there had to be a change to these abusive policies:
Many of you have read Henry Kriete’s
open letter documenting very significant systemic sins that have plagued our
congregations around the world. Throughout the church’s history here in
Orlando, we have been guilty of many of these same sins. Late in 2002, we began
giving serious consideration to the writings of some who had left the International
Church Of Christ because of these abusive practices. Those thoughts, as well as
the more recent ones in Henry’s letter, your sharing in our open forums, and
the prodding of God’s Spirit in our hearts, have led us to some very deep
convictions about the ways that we and other leaders spanning a 15 year period
– from the reconstruction of 1988 to the present – have sinned against many
individuals here, and indeed, against Christ’s church itself. –Orlando
Apology Letter
Unfortunately
not all of the ICOC leadership was humble enough to admit there needed to be a
change, some from Kip’s loyal camp lashed out at Kriete, saying that it was his
letter that caused the congregation to be “bitter” as is evident in Henry
Kriete’s second letter where he addresses these accusations:
According to a couple of these letters I
should be blamed for the bulk, if not all, of the problems facing the ICOC
right now. I want to offer a humble defense. I care very little about being
humiliated in public. That’s a cost I counted before I wrote H2G. (And probably
the only thing Kip and I share in common these days.) I want to set the record
straight because I take exception to being used as a scapegoat for the present
chaos which developed over the past 25 years, and I detest being used as a tool
to somehow bolster and justify the plans of these men with their bold visions
of the future. Henry ruined London! Henry caused all of this chaos and made
most of you bitter! How desperate is that? Even absurd?
I believe the ICOC has passed through
the fire of God's judgment and its foundation has been revealed for the wood
and straw it was. Period. It was not built on the word of Christ alone, as we
boasted all along, or it would not be in such a mess today.
Then
Henry Kriete addresses where this bitterness originated:
The intensity of feelings shocked me as
well. But wasn't that just a further verification of the points of my letter
and another indictment against us -the ICOC and our leadership sins? Wasn't it
a blow to the hubris and high walls of our ordered and compliant relationships?
Wasn't it simply the first floods from the undamming of our control mechanisms?
Where did so much pent up anger and frustration and lack of trust come from all
of a sudden? Did my letter create it, or was it already there? I think DJ said
it like this:’ Henry whistled while walking through the Alps and the avalanche
started.’ I like that. The snow was already there, waiting to crash down. It
was immanent and inevitable. We were so out of touch!
It's true, unfortunately, that sometimes
the open forums were abused and even hijacked by a few false brothers or deeply
embittered souls. But for the most part they were simply the outcry of pain and
disappointment and sincere questionings. Some Christians had great quantities
of pain hidden in their hearts and could finally speak out without fear of
repercussion. Now look out!
Basically
what Henry Kriete is saying here is that the ICOC leadership abused their
members for so long under a system of control that the moment that they lost
control of this system after years of abuses and exploitation it’s no wonder
that there was such a strong outcry. All that “bitterness” didn’t just come out
of nowhere; these frustrations and grievances had been pent up for years under
an oppressive leadership and then came down like an avalanche.
What
Kriete did was expose the damage that had already been done after years of
abuse, and then Kip and company tried to blame the damage of Kriete, the man
who exposed them.
I am appalled when people say I wrote my
letter in bitterness and not from my love for Christ and the church. I poured
out my life for our fellowship. I too made sacrifices, I too fought the wars, I
too had many wonderful friendships-and no one can deny me that! –2nd
Henry Kriete Letter
Now
what happened to Henry Kriete after this? From his second letter it shows that
the opposition against Kriete became strong enough that he felt he had to
leave; it is unfortunate that many leaders were still too stubborn to want to
repent. If Kriete hadn’t played his part in stopping the abuse then the ICOC
would have certainly faced even worse destruction further down the road and
this is evident from the fake apologies of Kip McKean’s letters afterward which
show that he had no intention of releasing the congregation from abusive
oppression (this especially evident since Kip has instituted the exact same
abusive oppression in his new organization).
Now
going back to Kip McKean’s letter; From
Babylon onto Zion, Kip also points out other leaders who had their families
fall apart with an almost hidden glee as these leaders were the same ones who
leveled accusations at Kip due to the fall-out of his own family.
Then
just before you thought that Kip McKean’s propaganda couldn’t get much worse he
writes:
With the questioning of the
“one-over-one” discipling and the elimination of the lead evangelist’s role in
larger congregations came the erosion of the Biblical role of an evangelist
being “over in the Lord” the churches in his geographic charge, even when those
congregations had elders. This paradigm shift caused the evangelists who worked
in these fields to lose their personal dreams to do great things because they
were now limited to a smaller group in a single city. Another mitigating factor
in the erosion of this role came from Henry Kriete’s questioning of the way
that money was spent, i.e. the lifestyles and the salaries of the evangelists.
He also charged that there was deceit surrounding our missions contributions
and the way the funds were spent. This charge was in spite of the fact that our
administrators have diligently practiced the highest ethical standards of
accounting and all of our large churches are audited annually by the most
reputable accounting firms. –Kip McKean, From Babylon Onto Zion
This
is a contradiction to some of the ICOC apology letters:
The past has been one of pressure and
control from outside individuals. Often decisions have been made which were not
in the best interests of the church in Minneapolis. People have been asked to
move even though it wasn’t in their best interest and it weakened the local
church. Although this has not happened during our time in the China/Northwest
world sector it has happened in the past and needs to be clearly condemned.
Over the years the Minneapolis church
has not had true control over its own finances. Large sums of money have been
required each year in the special contribution with no accountability regarding
how it was spent. –Minneapolis Apology Letter
And
here is what that same Minneapolis apology letter had to say about the
discipling relationships:
In an attempt to be unified, to
accomplish the great commission, and to genuinely help people on a deeper
‘heart’ level, the church adopted a practice of establishing discipleship
partners FOR people. We’ve allowed this system of discipleship to overstep the
bounds of authority that God gives the church. What started out with good
intentions has become a vehicle for control and invasiveness into member’s
lives. In these church-chosen relationships, people have been put, at times, in
artificial relationships. Also, a necessary part of this system became
establishing a culture where one was“over
another in the Lord”. This practice became uncomfortable at best. It was
especially awkward in instances where there was not a person with clear
spiritual maturity. At it’s worst, this practice often became oppressive and at
times, even abusive.
I
dare say that this goes beyond a mere “questioning of discipling relationships”
as Kip tried to downplay the seriousness of this in his letter. These are
admissions of abusing behavior that was done using this system of “discipling”.
As
an aside, this Minneapolis letter also disproves the claim by some ICC leaders
that they never taught that they were the “one true church” in which a person
could be saved, this letter shows that this is indeed what they tried to impose
on people:
The Bible clearly teaches that there is
one church (Col 1:18, 1 Cor 12:12-13, Eph 4:4-6). For some time, however, we
(ICOC) have held the belief that we are the one true church and that only
members of the ICOC are saved. We have allowed for the concept that other
disciples may exist elsewhere. We’ve asserted, however, that they would need to
join our fellowship upon finding the ICOC, in order to be “right” with God.
This teaching is wrong and arrogant. It is wrong and arrogant to assume that
anyone who is not a part of the ICOC fellowship is not saved. It is wrong
because there is no way for us to know another person’s heart. It is arrogant
because only God knows who is and who is not a part of His church: “The Lord
knows those who are his” (2 Timothy 2:19).
When
you try to trap people like this it gives the leadership an overwhelming amount
of power over the minds of others and this power was abused.
More Observations from Kip McKean’s Letter:
“From Babylon Onto Zion”
What once was a joyous sacrifice for
missions became a burdensome missions contribution multiple given under
compulsion.
This
is the only time in his article that Kip McKean admits to any kind of error
involving pressuring the congregation for money, however, his tactful wording
that the missions contribution “became burdensome” has the effect of implying
that this error somehow came about by mistake rather than by design. There is a
complete lack of personal responsibility of the leadership with Kip’s tone here
which suggests that it just somehow happened when it was the upper leadership
that put pressure on the congregation for giving increasing amounts of money.
“Ultimately, my most devastating sin was
claiming God’s victory as mine. In pride, I boasted in “my” accomplishments. I
allowed people to give me glory; I did not refocus them to God. Though some
have charged “growth was god,” this was never true. My goal was, and still is,
simply “to win as many as possible.” (1 Corinthians 9:19) However, people developed wrong motivations and stumbled because of my
overemphasis on numeric goals and accountability. (Though I still believe
in accountability if it is used wisely as Jesus did. Mark 6:30) In retrospect,
I see that many leaders did not imitate Christ in me, but my ungodly leadership
traits, and they are now being hurt by those they hurt.”
Once
again he tries to avoid the issue of coercing money out of the congregation by
obscurely using the word “accountability” without any indication to what this
actually refers to. By this time we know very well the things that were done in
the name of “accountability” such as telling leaders that they need to hold
their members “accountable” to giving whatever amount of money that was
demanded for the special contributions as well as using other “accountability”
arguments for issues with money which many of the ICOC leaders would later
admit to be acts of coercion. Also to be noted; even though he claims to be
confessing sin on this part he still throws in comments to defend his actions
such as that he was just trying to “win as many as possible”, and in his last
comment here Kip even tries to suggest that the reason people were hurt was
because the leaders under him had failed to imitate his Christ-like qualities
and had instead imitated his negative traits, thus attempting to shift some of
the blame off himself.
Also, the Gempels and Bairds felt that
over the next few months the bitterness would dissipate if the bitter World
Sector Leaders would just speak freely without Elena and me saying anything in
response to free them from their attitudes.
The combination of independently run
World Sectors, the lack of opportunity for the confronted leader to respond,
and an underlying bitterness produced by sins within the World Sector
Leaders’ leadership proved to have
catastrophic consequences. Over the next year, to the shock of each of the
World Sector Leaders, many of the same criticisms they directed towards me became
directed towards their leadership. There was an incredible amount of bitterness
and dissension among the Geographic Sector Leaders, Geographic HOPE Leaders,
Kingdom Teachers and World Sector Elders towards them. For the most part, the
World Sector Leaders have responded in humility and with repentance. However,
with no higher authority ready to reinforce the credibility and authority of
each of the World Sector Leaders, their influence in their groups began to
crumble. Their influence was further eroded when some in our fellowship, most of
whom had mainline church influences, denounced as unbiblical one-over-one
discipling as well as the title and role of World Sector Leader. –Kip McKean
Kip
accuses the World Sector leaders of “bitterness” and then says that their
leadership failed because they didn’t answer to a “higher authority” to
reinforce the credibility of their leadership.
Our brothers put before the kingdom a
“team approach,” suggesting in the introduction that this
would give us more growth in our
churches. Later, others took this team approach to an extreme,
which has now evolved into having no
point person, no “quarterback,” no lead evangelist as a
role on the leadership team with the
elders.
–Kip McKean
This
is Kip’s response to a certain book titled Golden
Rule Leadership which was written by Gordon Ferguson and Wyndham Shaw. He
criticizes the leadership for not having a “point man” to lead them, however,
it is all too obvious who Kip truly thought this point man position should
belong to as can be seen in a letter written to Kip by the ICOC leadership on October 3, 2005:
Brother, we are glad you have
acknowledged these sins, but we do not see change in you beyond mere surface
changes to satisfy people for the moment. We would also add that you not only allow
people to give you the glory, you encourage it and reward them for it as in the
most recent Portland Jubilee.
You have said publicly that you repented
of your arrogance. At the Portland Church Builder
Conference, shortly after you said you
had repented of your arrogance and pride, you said, "I can fix any
church." When you were recently asked
privately if you were willing to be a team player with other brothers in
cooperative leadership, your response
was, "You don't understand. I am the
star."
Your writing, your sermons and your
website consistently contain unseemly, immature and unwholesome self-promotion
and propaganda. It took multiple conversations from many of us before you ever
commended any church but your own. You say publicly that you have repented of
lifting yourself up, yet almost every bulletin article is about you and your
ministry. Your entire view of our fellowship centers around who is with you and
who is against you. This is unrighteous, unspiritual, immature and even
irrational. –Addressed
to Kip McKean by the ICOC churches.
I
will include a link to the entire letter on my blog, as well as the Apology
Letters. If you look at the bottom of the letter, you will notice that among
the leaders who signed it, you will find Blaise Feumba’s signature. Blaise came
over to the ICC in 2008 after he was caught red-handed by the ICOC for embezzling money from the Abidjan church and then asked to resign. Instead of
owning up to his sin, however, he fled to the ICC where he is now part of Kip
McKean’s inner circle. It is apparent that Kip pays no intention to the
personal integrity of the people he hires and in fact having leaders with unrepented corrupt pasts allows Kip to
better control them via blackmail, which is why he keeps Victor Gonzalez Sr. as
part of his inner circle as well.
Since there was so much distrust
revealed at the LA Unity Meeting, it was not surprising that when some of the
Geographic Sector Leaders returned to their home congregations, they found the
same mistrust, anger and hurt in their own staffs and memberships as well. As
with the World Sector Leaders before them, this level of leadership, also, was
totally surprised by the response that surfaced. In retrospect, it is easily
understood that they simply reaped from their own people what they, in many
cases unconsciously, had sown: the attitude of mistrust of those who led and discipled
them. (Matthew 7:1-5)
–Kip McKean
Kip
suggests here that the hurt and anger felt by congregations around the world
was due to their mistrust of the system that he had built, rather than
admitting that it had been his system of psychological and financial abuse that
had hurt the members. After this meeting Kip McKean had left to go on his
“sabbatical” for a year and a half, in this letter he blames the sector leaders
for the anger and distrust felt toward them; saying that they were reaping what
they had sown as if this hurt and anger hadn’t been his fault at all. He leaves
the Church that has been damaged by his abusive leadership and then blames
these leaders for the very mess that he himself created.
Many have concluded the reason for all
of this sin, disorder and bitterness was “the system” –
World Sector Leaders, discipleship
partners, Bible Talks, megachurches, the “Study Series,” etc.
(Some have even gone so far as to call
it the “evil” system.) A system is simply applying Biblical principles to
create methods. Some churches in the name of “freedom in Christ” have abandoned
all methodologies such as Bible Talks, discipleship partners, etc. We must have
a system that uses Biblical principles in order to evangelize the world. –Kip McKean
It
is interesting to note here that Kip criticizes the ICOC on the basis that some
of their Churches had done away with discipleship partners and bible talks, and
yet once again he avoids the issue of abusive money policies as being part of
the system and instead obscurely alludes to “sin, disorder, and bitterness”
instead of addressing the main concerns that people had with his organization
(such as the coercive tactics used to obtain money). The real issue here was
not the existence of World Sector Leaders and disciplers but rather how these
leadership positions were being used to exploit the congregation (although for
some ICOC Churches the existence of these titles did end up becoming an issue,
a fact that Kip likes to pounce on whenever this subject is brought up). Kip
tries to hint here that the system he created was merely the result of
“applying Biblical principles”, as if there were no fault to his methods even
though this is contradictory to his earlier admission of sin.
Though our fellowship has been
persecuted for years for our Biblical convictions, we are now disgraced in the
eyes of the world – in newspapers, magazines and especially on the internet –
for the shocking truth of our disunity, rebellion and confusion. –Kip McKean,
“From Babylon Onto Zion”
Once
again we see Kip McKean’s blatant attempt at diverting attention away from the
abusive control and coercion for money by an obscure statement that this was
merely “disunity, rebellion and confusion”. I don’t think there is any
“confusion” here, it is all too clear now what Kip was doing to the
congregation, this is nothing but a smokescreen. This “rebellion” was an
indignation against constant abuse and unwillingness to repent on the part of
the upper leadership, until the Apology Letters finally came out. The
“disunity” here is the result of some leaders wanting to make the decision to
repent while others stubbornly did not want to change (part of this initial
unwillingness to repent had to do with the arrogance that Kip had allowed to
take root in the upper leadership), this type of division could not have been
avoided and yet Kip still tries to make this out as sinful “disunity” on their
part, taking advantage of the chaos to point blame. Even the ICC teaches today
that “good division” is necessary for repentance (Matthew 10:34-39), but I
guess Kip thinks that such division is only “good division” when it results in
him being in charge and making the decisions that he wants.
Conclusion
In
this letter Kip McKean’s letter “From
Babylon onto Zion” his manipulative nature becomes evident; at one moment
he is spewing half-hearted apologies for his sins which are painted with
significant obscurity, and then the next he is accusing the congregation and
the World Sector leaders of being “bitter” against him and lashing out, thus
trying to make himself look like the victim. The reader is shaken back and
forth as Kip makes a show of apologizing for his sin and then at the same time
attempts to defend his actions with words that are tactfully placed as well as
making obscure statements that the leaders who asked him to resign were “in
sin” as well as spreading additional propaganda that the ICOC was throwing away
their direction and authority by getting rid of a central leadership. In the
end Kip’s letter was just a poor acting job on his part to pretend that he had
repented from his past sins, and then turning around and trying to shift the
blame onto the other ICOC leaders for the mess that he caused. He uses the
ensuing chaos to his advantage; hinting to them that this wouldn’t have
happened if they had just continued to trust in his leadership and the system
which he created rather than admitting to how abusive and damaging this system
was.
When
I hear people in the ICC speaking about the aftermath of the ICOC in getting
rid of a central leader form of church government they say that the church
began to “stink of ungodliness”, as if this ungodliness came from the ICOC
leaders forcing Kip to resign and choosing for churches to be self-governing.
The truth is, this ungodliness had been around long before the Henry Kriete
letter came out and had always existed in the form of abusive control and
coercion of the members. People were promoted to leadership positions who were
willing to go along with this manipulation; with this system of control in
place this ungodliness was controlled and focused only on the aspects of
controlling and coercing for money. These people were allowed to rise into the
upper leadership who were of questionable intentions and who respected the word
of Kip and his followers over the Word of God. With Kip gone and the system
falling apart, this ungodliness was allowed to manifest itself in other ways.
Kip’s policies had allowed ungodly men to assume positions of power, and
without Kip and company around to hold onto their leashes they were allowed to
run rampant. This is why such chaos ensued during this time, some good-hearted
ICOC leaders truly wanted repentance and change for the better while others had
no idea what godly leadership even meant or even how to follow the Bible. Some
of the current ICC members who saw this chaos tell harrowing tales of ICOC
leaderships allowing their members to date non-Christians; this was to be
expected since many of the people who occupied these positions of leadership
had no idea how to teach out of the scriptures without someone else
spoon-feeding them what to believe (and they had seen their previous leaders
twisting so many scriptures around that at this point they probably had no idea
what to believe). Some of the more corrupt ICOC leaders even used their power
to further swindle the congregation. This was the aftermath of what Kip
McKean’s controlling leadership had caused which only allowed people to be
leaders if they unquestioningly complied with his coercive policies rather than
people who had convictions in following the scriptures and a true heart for God.
Looking
back at Kip’s letter and considering the things that Kip has done with the ICC.
It is now obvious why Kip chose to be obscure toward certain aspects of his sin
and his deliberate failure to address the methods that were used to coerce
money from the congregation; he intended to use these abusive tactics once
again as can be shown from my previous articles which show how he deceptively
sneaked them into his new church. In his letter Kip tries desperately to avoid
bringing up anything which could bring scrutiny to the system he created and
deliberately attempts to deflect the attention of the reader to other issues.
Kip wanted to protect the system, to keep it intact so that it could be used
again for his own profit. For Kip, this kind of intentional manipulation with
the goal of reinstating an abusive system after pretending to apologize along
with distorted accounts of past events and deceitful propaganda he spread to
try to achieve this goal; this amounts to sociopathic behavior (http://www.wikihow.com/Spot-a-Sociopath).
The
ICOC Apology Letters made it clear that there was much abuse of power and
coercion for money as well as manipulative systems of “advice” set up to
control members. In the six years I was with the ICC, whenever I asked what
happened to Kip’s “Old Movement” they would say that there were a few problems
prior to Henry Kriete writing his letter, but then they would say that Kriete
then caused the damage that followed; this could not be further from the truth.
Kriete’s letter had caused an oppressive control system to falter by exposing
it for what it was, and then the outcries of the abused were released. Kip
tries to denounce this letter as “overemotional” and “bitter” (even in his new
organization I would hear some talking about Kriete with a hint of scorn), but after
reading it all I see is a man with a heart for God’s people and a zeal for righteousness
and godly repentance. With so much propaganda and misinformation being spread
by Kip and those who serve under him much of the information on these past events
has been mired with darkness and obscurities within the ICC congregations. At
the beginning of the ICC Kip claimed that he had repented of his past abusive
behavior, but this was nothing but a fake repentance as he has intentionally
built the exact same abusive system again. A kingdom that is not built on God
will not last (Matthew 7:24-29). Kip McKean’s “Old Movement” had become a den
of robbers and the spirit of Jesus came down on the Church with a fury against
the abuse of His people. With the same abusive policies in place as before, the
same fate now awaits the ICC.
We love the revolutionary, but not if it
is to overthrow us.
We commend the Bereans for questioning
Paul, but not if they question us.
We love the radical spirit of Josiah,
unless he digs up our bones for exposure.
We want opinion leaders, but not if
there opinion is against us.
We love to denounce the blind Pharisees,
but refuse to see the Pharisee in us.
–Henry
Kriete, Honest to God
From an anonymous email:
ReplyDeleteFrom kipmckean.com - "Concerning “the evangelization of the nations in this generation,” some have asked, “What is going to be different this ‘second time’ around?” This presupposes the question, “Can it be different this second time?” The answer in the Scriptures is a resounding yes! The first time the Israelites approached the Promised Land, their lack of faith led them to the dreadful desires to choose a different leader than the one God had chosen and to return to their lives of slavery in Egypt. This unbelief ultimately resulted in their death in the desert. The second time the Spirit led the Israelites to the border of the Promised Land, the Hebrew people – having learned to rely on God in their wanderings in the desert – now succeeded to make God’s dream and promise a reality."
So Kip blames a lack of faith and the "dreadful desires to choose a different leader than the one God had chosen" as the reasons for the first failure. Wow, if that's not arrogance, I don't know what is - comparing himself to Moses. He accepts zero responsibility.
Doug, I was a member of the ICOC Atlanta church for a year and a half in 1997-98. My experience was not nearly as traumatic as a lot of former members. That being said, the church was doing some of the same unbiblical practices and abuses that Kip Mckean is doing now. The Atlanta church was a large congregation (about 5000) . My brother is still in the ICOC in Atlanta, although it reformed after kip got fired. The Atlanta church split into about 12 different separate congregations. I was never shunned by my friends in the church after I left, which I know is unusual. I left because of doctrinal issues. I am a Christian. Iwas a Christian before the ICOC and I will always be. Contrary to what the Church of Christ (from which the ICOC and ICC came from) you cant lose your salvation. Kip twisted Scripture, misinterpreted Scripture, and justified his doctrines by employing eisegesus, which means inserting your own agenda into the Word of God. Your experience in the ICC tell me that kip and his cronies have gotten even more fanatical and cultic. Their love of money and power is much worse than in the ICOC. There are many, many unscriptual and unbiblical practices that I wont list here. The ICC is a dangerous cult. Anyone that wants more info from me need only ask
ReplyDeleteSorry, Daniel. Got your name wrong.
ReplyDeleteKip McKean has a long history of twisting Scripture to advance his agenda. He also has lied about his beginnings. Back in the days of the icoc he claimed that his doctrinal views came as revelations from God. The truth is that so called discipling ministry churches already existed. He was trained by Chuck Lucas, the pastor of the Crossroads Church of Christ in Gainesville, Florida in the late 60's. I didnt learn any of this until after I left the icoc in 1998. Every scripture that Kip uses in his doctrine is either twisted, taken out of context, or misintrepeted, either deliberately or accidentally. Some ICC doctrine is taken directly from the mainline Church of Christ. My dad's family has for a long time been members of this church. My mom's family is Baptist. The ICOC/ICC has always denounced denominational churches. The term "denomination" in regards to churches is to unite a group of churches. So, both of these groups started by Kip are denominational churches. To me, this is just one instance of hypocrisy and manipulation of many. Every biblical passage used here is used wrongly. There are two main issues of doctrine of the Church of Christ that I strongly disagree with, the teachings on baptism and the teachings on losing your salvation. I can back up everything with Scripture. (I include the ICOC and ICC with the Church of Christ here since Kip got his start in the Cof C.) I am not bringing this up just for kicks. On the salvation issue alone I think it is sad that some people live in fear of losing their salvation. People dont have to feel this way.
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, no offense, but I find this very ironic. Loosing salvation and baptism for the forgiveness of sins are actually one of the only things that the ICC teaches that is actually Biblical. When I talk about the ICC’s “unbiblical practices”; I am talking about their coercion for money, deceptive tactics, slander against critics, outright lies, and their demand for blind obedience to their “central leadership” (and of course their teachings on “central leadership” itself).
DeleteNow they do abuse the concept of losing salvation, such as telling their Bible talk leaders to make sure all the people in their bible talk have their “special contribution” ready in order to “protect the salvation” of the members of their bible talks. The ICC has found it to be a useful intimidation tool for control, and this control is used as a means for profit. It is a very disgusting practice, however, the teaching itself of losing salvation is actually biblical. John 15:5-6, Ezekiel3:18-21, Ezekiel 18:24-26, and Romans 11:17-23 are just a few scriptures that show that loosing salvation is a biblical concept and remember that Philippians 2:12 says to work out your salvation with fear and trembling.
There are also many scriptures to support baptism for the forgiveness of sins, and if you study Christian history this was also the belief held by the early Christians. I already mentioned in article 4 how teachings contrary to this belief did not significantly arise in Christianity until the 14th century and did not become popular until the 1500’s.
The ICC’s tactic of deception is to mix lies in with the truth. When I was recruited, losing salvation and baptism for the forgiveness of sins were presented to me during their “first principles” studies, then after I became a member they then tried to feed me their beliefs about “one-man central” leadership and the other propaganda that I mentioned throughout my articles.
For people who leave the ICC, however, many are tempted to criticize the teachings of losing salvation and baptism for the forgiveness of sins because they cannot bring themselves to believe that these scammers could actually teach anything that is true. Such is the effect of self-biasing. It is also very tempting to cast off these beliefs because a lot of seemingly “good-hearted” churches do not teach this. People want to seek new places to socialize and therefore adapt their belief systems accordingly.